John C. Jarosz

Education
M.A., economics, and Ph.D. candidate, economics, Washington University in St. Louis; J.D., University of Wisconsin; B.A., economics and organizational communication, Creighton University
Summary of Experience
Mr. Jarosz is an economist and director of Analysis Group’s Washington, DC office. He specializes in matters involving intellectual property (IP), commercial damages, licensing, and antitrust. His IP work focuses on evaluating lost profits, reasonable royalties, price erosion, commercial success, licensing terms, best efforts, irreparable harm, and FRAND commitments. Mr. Jarosz has significant expertise testifying in patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret tort and contract matters. He is also experienced in both US and international arbitration, often serving as an expert witness in matters involving IP rights.
A frequent author and lecturer on the economics of IP protection, Mr. Jarosz has participated in and given presentations at various meetings of the Sedona Conference, Intellectual Property Owners Association, Licensing Executives Society, and the Association of University Technology Managers. He has published a variety of papers in professional and practitioner journals, and he has taught classes at Georgetown University Law Center, George Washington University Law School, the University of Pennsylvania Law School and Department of Economics, Columbia Business School, and the US Patent and Trademark Office. Mr. Jarosz has been recognized for many years as among the top economic experts for IP matters by Intellectual Asset Management (IAM) in the IAM Patent 1000, which identifies leading patent professionals around the globe.
Provided Expert Testimony
- Bavarian Nordic v. Acambis, PLC (Inv. No. 337-TA-550)
- Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
- Bial - Portela & CA S.A., et al. v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd., et al.
- Cogent Systems, Inc. v. Northrop Grumman Corporation
- Dolby International AB, GE Video Compression, LLC, and Koninklijke Philips NV v. MAS Elektronik Aktiengesellschaft
- E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Industries Inc.
- Fishman Transducers, Inc. v. Stephen Paul d/b/a Esteban, et al.
- Galderma Laboratories et al. v. Tolmar, Inc.
- In the Matter of Certain Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges Containing the Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-1012)
- InnoPharma Licensing Inc. et al. v. Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al.
- Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc., v. Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc.
- Otsuka Pharmaceuticals Abilify Litigations
- St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants Inc. v. Toshiba Corp. et al.
- The Vineyard House, LLC v. Constellation Brands U.S. Operations, Inc., and Constellation Brands U.S. Operations, Inc. v. The Vineyard House, LLC
- Universal Electronics Inc. v. Universal Remote Control, Inc.
- Windstream Holdings, Inc., et al. v. Charter Communications Inc. and Charter Communications Operating, LLC
Additional Cases
-
Global Issues In EU's Licensing Plans For Essential Patents
Law360.com, June 1, 2023
2023 -
Lost Profits Damages: Principles, Methods, and Applications (second edition)
Valuation Products and Services, LLC, 2022
2022Kinrich J, Harry E
Accounting, Antitrust & Competition, Commercial Disputes, Damages, Intellectual Property, Surveys & Experimental Studies, Tax, Valuation -
-
Preliminary Injunctive Relief in Patent Cases: Repairing Irreparable Harm
Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, Vol. 31, pp. 63–130, 2022
2022Jarosz JC, Contreras JL, Vigil RL
Intellectual Property -
Patent damages in US courts: overview of current state of play
IAM Yearbook 2019, October 2018
2018Jarosz J, McLean J, Mulhern C, Vigil R
Intellectual Property -
Introduction to Lost Profits
Lost Profits Damages: Principles, Methods, and Applications
2017 -
REBUTTAL It's Not An Inappropriate Reasonable Royalty Rule
Law360, August 21, 2015
2015Chapman M, Jarosz J
Intellectual Property -
Assessing Commercial Success at the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board
International In-house Counsel Journal, Vol. 8, No. 32,
Intellectual Property
2015 -
-
Problems With Hypothesizing Reasonable Royalty Negotiation
Law360, January 7, 2014
2014Jarosz J, Chapman M
Damages, Intellectual Property -
The Hypothetical Negotiation and Reasonable Royalty Damages: The Tail Wagging the Dog
Stanford Technology Law Review, August 29, 2013
2013Jarosz J, Chapman M
Damages, Intellectual Property, Valuation -
Patent Auctions: How Far Have We Come?
les Nouvelles
2010Jarosz J, Hess P, Bieri C, Heider R, Bazelon C
Intellectual Property, Valuation -
-
The Economic Implications (and Uncertainties) of Obtaining Permanent Injunctive Relief After eBay v. MercExchange
The Federal Circuit Bar Journal, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 437–71, 2008
2008Jarosz J, Chapman M, Ellis D, Oliver L
Damages, Intellectual Property -
Application of Game Theory to Intellectual Property Royalty Negotiations
Licensing Best Practices: Strategic, Territorial, and Technology Issues
2006Chapman M, Jarosz J
Damages, Intellectual Property -
Book Review: The LESI Guide to Licensing Best Practices: Strategic Issues and Contemporary Realities
Intellectual Property Law Newsletter
Damages, Intellectual Property, Valuation
2003 -
Use of the 25 Per Cent Rule in Valuing IP
Les Nouvelles, Journal of The Licensing Executives Society
2002Goldscheider R, Jarosz J, Mulhern C
Intellectual Property, Valuation -
Intellectual Property Valuation and Hughes Aircraft v. The United States: A Giant Leap for Mankind or Lost in Space?
Intellectual Property Infringement Damages: A Litigation Support Handbook, 1997 Cumulative Supplement
1997Jarosz J, Reed BL
Damages, Intellectual Property, Valuation -
Damages in Patent and Trademark Infringement
The Journal of Business Valuation
Damages, Intellectual Property, Valuation
1995 -
The Panduit Lost Profits Test After BIC Leisure v. Windsurfing
The Federal Circuit Bar Journal
1993Jarosz J, Page EM
Damages, Intellectual Property -
-
Pre-tax versus After-tax Patent Damages: Do The Courts Have It Right?
Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Damages, Intellectual Property
1992 -
The CAFC and Its Patent Damages Awards
The University of Baltimore Intellectual Property Law Journal
Damages, Intellectual Property
1992 -
Considering Taxes in the Computation of Lost Business Profits
Creighton Law Review
Damages, Intellectual Property
1991
-
January 18, 2023
Managing Principal John Jarosz to Co-Chair Patent and Trade Secret Remedies Summit
Event: Litigating Patent and Trade Secret Remedies
Host: Certified Patent Valuation Analyst Training Program
-
July 18, 2023
-
June 6, 2023
-
September 19, 2022
-
February 7, 2022

-
AG Feature Machine Power: Applications of Natural Language Processing in Economic Consulting
-
Forum Reconsidering the Hypothetical Negotiation
-
Video John Jarosz - Delivering Expert Testimony on Intellectual Property Valuation
-
Forum A Look at Patent Litigation and Valuation Post Reform
-
Case OutcomeSt. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants Inc. v. Toshiba Corp. et al.